Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Tab Update: Solaris and X

The following tabs have been updated.
OpenWindows / OpenLook Documentation
  • [PDF] X Windows System User Guide - OpenLook Edition (Volume 3) 
  • [PDF] XView Programming Manual (XView Version 3.2 -Volume 7a)
  • [PDF] XView Reference Manual (XView Version 32 - Volume 7b)

O'Reilly Books
[pdf|html] Volume 6A: Motif Programming Manual
[pdf] Volume 3: XWindows System User Guide; OpenLook Edition
[pdf] Volume 7A: XView Programming Manual
[pdf] Volume 7B: XView Reference Manual

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Cisco Fires Shot at EMC: Parallels to Replace VMWare?

A very short update on Cloud Computing...

EMC: Build Their Own Server...
We remember that during EMC World in June 2012, EMC started the process of building their own cloud system... without Cisco.

EMC: The Missing Switch...
EMC acquired Nicira, to fix their hole in their networking stack, as discussed during VMWare World 2012 in August 2012. VMWare also started selling cloud engineering professional services.

Cisco: The Missing Hypervisor...
This left Cisco in a very difficult position - where would Cisco go to get a Hypervisor? Cisco just tool a significant equity stake in Parallels, in order to gain one. Perhaps, they should have thought about KVM on Illumos.

EMC & Cisco: The Missing OS...
While EMC and Cisco are continuing to gobble up components (still missing an OS) for their proprietary clouds, Oracle had released The First Cloud OS back in 2012 - it was called Solaris 11. Of course, Microsoft can't be left behind, copy'ing Oracle, saying Windows Server 2012 is the First Cloud OS! LOL!

Of course, Illumos is still an option for both EMC and Cisco... and Cisco would not have needed to buy an equity stake in Parallels, had they gone the Illumos route from the beginning. Joyent has been selling Clouds on Illumos for some time, even appearing in Gartner's Magic Quadrant starting in 2009.

What was Cisco thinking?

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

DefenseCode: Linksys 0 Day Vulnerability

DefenseCode: Linksys 0 Day Vulnerability

Security professionals DefenseCode identified a security vulnerability in Linksys router software, which allows people to achieve privileged command line access without authentication. There is no known patch, at this point, to thwart the exploit.
Whose Talking:
The exploit has been reported inTech/Science news like The Register and Slash-Dot and Net-Security and
It appears the exploit.

A Register User quotes DefenseCode CEO Leon Juranicvor regarding internet vulnerability:
We're still investigating some tricks to exploit this vulnerability from the internet, but for now, yes - it seems safe from the outside of the network. Of course, unless services are available from the internet
Cisco has responded to The Register:
"Linksys takes the security of our products and customers’ home networks very seriously. Although we can confirm contact with DefenseCode, we have no new vulnerability information to share with customers – for our WRT54GL or other home routers. We will continue to review new information that comes to light and will provide customer updates as appropriate."
Cisco has responded, according to Net-Security:
After the researchers posted their findings online, Cisco finally got in touch again. They are expected to release a fix in time for the full advisory, which should see the light of day in about 10 days.
There is a vulnerability, a patch is coming, and everyone knows about it.
Implications: If you are a Network Operations Center, keep an eye out for the patches coming from Cisco/Linksys and get ready for a huge patch software automation. If you do not have Network Management service with a vendor, you should consider such a service for times such as these.

Monday, January 14, 2013

JavaScript: PDF Project

[Adobe PDF icon, courtesy Wikipedia]
Printing, fonts, and font rendering was standardized on the PostScript language. This grew into PDF, where individual pages would be rendered. Change continues to press on, with Adobe buying Frame Technologies, Oracle buying Sun Microsystems, and now Mozilla Foundation is moving web browsers like FireFox to render PDF natively via JavaScript.

[PostScript to bit map font, courtesy xaraxone]
PostScript language was born in 1976 by John Warnock. The first laser printers used it in Xerox PARC in between 1975-1976. Adobe was founded in 1982, Warnock a co-founder, and Steve jobs visited around 1984, and encouraged them to use PostScript to drive laerprinters. PostScript and Laser Printers merged, and the Apple LaserWriter was released in 1985.

[Adobe FrameMaker logo, courtesy Wikipedia]
Desktop Publishing:
Adobe, with desktop publishing packages (like FrameMaker, from Frame Technologies, later purchased by Adobe) creating the UNIX Workstation market. Quark's Xpress created the desktop Publishing Market, predominately under Apple systems. PostScript was embedded into the OS layer for displays on workstation vendors such as Sun Microsystems (NeWS) and NeXT (Display Postscript) and even a subset on PC's such as the Apple Macintosh (QuickDraw.)
[QuarkXpress Logo, courtesy Wikipedia]
Internet Publishing:
PDF was later created by Adobe, to allow the display of a page, instead of a document, allowing for better performance on long document rendering/printing, so multiple processors could work on multiple pages simultaneously.  This was at the beginning of documentation becoming electronic, instead of being paper driven. This was at the beginning of The Internet, when HTML was considered weak, but the potential was considered great.

[ISO Logo, courtesy wikipedia]
PDF was created by Adobe in 1993. PDF became an open standard in 1998. The standard was published by the International Organization for Standardization as ISO 32000-1:2008. The Apple Macintosh was the first system to render PDF's natively at the OS layer. Only the newest PDF's require an OS plug-in. PDF viewing came natively to iOS devices like the iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad, and iPad Mini. Mozilla started moving towards native PDF rendering, making plug-ins unnecessary for all but the newest PDF formats.
[Mozilla Logo]
Netscape Communications created in 1994 the first commercially viable web browser, web server, open secure transaction layer (HTTP encrypted over SSL, aka HTTPS) , client & server side scripting (originally termed LiveScript, later called JavaScript) - which is recognized as integral parts of The Internet today. All of this operated over an existing TCP/IP network.

In 1998, Netscape spun-off Mozilla, to create an open sourced network browser and other Internet tools, and many of it's commercial assets were consumed by Sun Microsystems.

Mozilla launched the PDF.js project in 2011. The PDF.js project technology was recently released in Mozilla's FireFox browser. An example of the JavaScript based PDF viewer can be tried by anyone with an HTML5 compliant browser. This has been released in FireFox 19.0 Beta 1.
[Mozilla JavaScript rendering of PDF, courtesy Mozilla
Mozilla's FutureReleases blog discusses the new budding feature. It may be interesting to see JavaScript leveraged on the server side, with this library, to perform dynamic PDF content creation. 
The Internet, a TCP/IP suite of applications, traffic protocols, documents, and media - which make up what is commonly called "the internet" today. Two decade old technology (HTML & JavaScript) seems powerful enough to now consume three decade old technology (PDF.) JavaScript will probably continue to grow ubiquitous, including servers side applications.

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Connectivity: Past, Present, and The Future (is Thunderbolt)

[Apple/Intel Thunderbolt logo, courtesy Wikipedia]
Computing systems do not exist without various interconnect technology. Over time, interconnects went from parallel to serial, always incrementing faster along the way. Toward the modern end of this progression comes Apple/Intel Thunderbolt technology, combining digital video ports with PCI Express, leveraging daisy-channing concepts from FireWire and SCSI.

[Network connection, courtesy veryicon]
A Short History of Interconnects:
Computing systems always had some kind of proprietary interconnect, normally originating with a single vendor, but over time, the interconnects started to standardize.
[System Bus Illustration, courtesy Wikipedia]
 System Bus Interconnects: Some interconnects would connect cards along a parallel path, often CPU's to memory and I/O peripherals... sometimes from CPU's to CPU's, othertimes specifically for video cards. This is sometimes referred to as a "bus".  
[VERSAbus memory card, courtesy Wikipedia]
Initial Motorola (and later cross-vendor compatible) bus connections included: VERSAbusVME (ANSI/IEEE Std 1014-1987, ANSI/VITA 1-1994), VXI Bus [VME eXtensions for Instrumentation], VPX or VITA46 [VME International Trade Association].

[Two SBus cards, courtesy Wikipedia]
Initial Open Systems SPARC bus connections included: SBus (IEEE-1496), MBus (document), XBus, KBus, UPA (Ultra Port Architecture.)

[5x 16 bit and 1x 8 bit ISA card slots, courtesy Wikipedia]
Intitial open and proprietary Intel bus connections included: S-100 (or Altair bus, IEEE696-1983),  ISA (IBM PC/XT 8 bit, IBM PC/AT 16 bit), EISA (32 bit Intel based bus), MCA (proprietary 16 bit or 32 bit bus), VLB (VESA Local Bus), AGP (Accelerated Graphics Port),  PCMCIA (Personal Computer Memory Card International Association, Type I-IV), PCMCIA 2.0 (PC Card), PCMCIA 5.0 (CardBus), ExpressCard.

[3x PCI Bus Slots, courtesy Wikipedia]
Later industry cross-platform standards included: PCI (Peripheral Component Interconnect), PCI-X [PCI eXtended], PCIe (PCI Express),

[Televideo Terminal, courtesy Wikipedia]
Human Interface Interconnects:
Human interfaces have typically been serial for low speed and parallel for high-speed applications, with a movement toward analog for high speed applications and back to serial again for display outut. Terminals were initially just keyboards, where the keyboard attached via a parallel connector and the output converted to serial for long transmission. Display output was driven typically through parallel printers (or serial printers for longer runs.)
[5 pin DIN, courtesy Wikipedia]
Human interfaces moved towards integrated terminals, where serial (RS232) connections attached to an integrated keyboard and video display unit. The serial port of choice for many devices became the ubiquitous DIN connector - covering applications such as Cassette & Disk Drives (Commodore Vic-20, 64, etc.); keyboards (IBM PC, XT, AT, etc.); Cassette, Joystick, and Modem/Printer ports (TRS-80 Color Computer, Color Computer 2, Color Computer 3, etc.) While DIN was firmly established, new devices like the Mouse would use standard DB-25 or later DE-9 pin serial and later keyboard and and mouse serial interfaces (IBM PS/2) used smaller DIN-like form factor. The video display units used analog connections internally or externally. Keyboard which were integrated typically used a parallel connection, but needed a parallel-to-serial converter when broken into a separate discrete part. Printers could be driven from the terminal or the computer less locally via slower serial or (more locally via higher-speed Centronics parallel printer ports. The parallel ports were also used, with SASI/SCSI protocols, for accessing later external removable disk & tape media (Zip, Jaz, CD-ROM, Tape, etc.) drives.

[Some video display types, courtesy Wikipedia]
As video interfaces moved towards external monitors, various analog and digital interfaces were developed: RF, Composite (analog), 9 Pin Digital, CGA [Color Graphics Adapter], EGA [Enghanced Graphics Adapter], VGA [Video Graphics Array] (analog) and other derivatives (XGA, SVGA, etc.), DVI [Digital Visual Interface] (digital and analog), HDMI (digital only), DisplayPort (digital only).

[Sun Workstation, courtesy Wikipedia]
Storage Interconnects:
The Terminal continued to grow in functionality and capabilities, until they turned into hobby personal computers, business computers, scientific workstations, and later, ironically, back into thin clients with graphical processing power (X Terminals), and even thinner clients with merely acting as a audio-video multiplexer (SunRay.) This created an ever needing expansion in communication technologies for interconnects. Long term storage was done against punch cards (printers without ink), tape, solid state cartridges, rotating disks, with a movement back to solid-state in more recent time.

[SCSI Logo, courtesy Wikipedia]
Communication to storage was done via serial, parallel for speed, and back to serial via technologies such as, SASI [Shugart Associates System Interface], ST-506, ST-412, ESDI [Enhanced Small Disk Interface], SCSI [Small Computer Systems Interface] of various parallel bus widths for intelligent controllers, AT Attachment (aka IDE [Integrated Drive Electronics] & Parallel ATA) for consumer grade usage, FibreChannel, SAS [Serially Attached SCSI] for enterprise/industrial grade usage, SATA [Serially attached ATA] (with derivatives such as eSATA) for consumer grade equipment.
SAS was unusual in that it also offered backwards-compatibility with dumber SATA devices, so enterprise-grade controllers could take advantage of consumer-grade higher capacity (but lower quality) storage drives.

[Host based computer network, courtesy Wikipedia]
Network Interconnects:
The business computer eclipsed the personal computer and scientific workstation markets, with specialization occurring on Gaming Consoles, integrated Smart Phones (Blackberry, iPhone, etc.), and Tablets (Kindle, iPad, etc.) This process drove the need for many new communications modes and protocols - but nearly all of them centered upon the drive from parallel-type communication. These network interconnects, local or wide area in nature, were nearly universally serial.

[Ethernet LAN Connection, courtesy Wikipedia]
LAN [Local Area Network] technologies included technologies such as: RS232 and other Serial Ports, Ethernet of various speeds (StarLAN/1Mb, 10Mb, 100Mb, 1Gb, 10Gb, 40Gb, 100Gb, 1Tb), Token Ring (4Gb, 16Gb), and Fiber
[A bad WAN illustration, courtesy Wikipedia]
WAN [Wide Area Network] technologies included technologies such as:  modems over analog POTS [Plain Old Telephone Service) voice quality lines, X.25http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.25, ISDN [Integrated Services Digital Network] in the form of BRI [Basic Rate Interface], PRI [Primary Rate Interchange], B-ISDN [Broadband ISDN], DS-0/E-0DS-1/T1, DS-3/T3, E1-4ATM [Asynchronous Transfer Mode], PDM [Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy], SONET [Synchronous Optical Networking] (including: OC-1, OC-3, OC-12, OC-48, etc.), SDM [Synchronous Digital Hierarchy].
[802.11b/g/n 2.4GHz non-overlapping wireless bands, courtesy Wikipedia]
With the advent of cellular phones, wireless communications grew in popularity, both for WAN and LAN usage. Various WAN technologies included: 1G (1st Generation), 2G (including 2.5G, 2.75G, 2.9G, etc.), 3G (including 3.5G and 3.75G, etc.), 4G (including WiMAX and LTE [Long Term Evolution].) Various LAN technologies included: WiFi (802.11b, 802.11a, 802.11g, 802.11n, etc.) and WiGig (802.11ad).

[Firewire Logo, courtesy Wikipedia]
Common Peripheral Interconnects:
Gradually, the communication to storage devices, printers, and human interface devices merged. There was 2 classes of standard interfaces: low-speed dumb interfaces at a lower price-point and high-speed smart interfaces at a higher price-point.

[USB Connector, courtesy Wikipedia]
USB (USB 1.1, 2.0, 3.0, etc.) appeared for lower speed applications (12 mbit/s, 480 mbit/s, 5000 mbit/s) where performance and quality of service were not as important. USB remained a master-slave relationship, where the main computer system was loaded with processing load, sometimes affecting quality of service, but significantly reduced costs. Devices would be added through a hub, where speed would be cut in half each time a ^2 factor of devices was hit.
[9 pin Firewire 800 connector, courtesy Wikipedia]
FireWire (IEEE-1394a, IEEE-1394b, iLink, etc.) appeared for higher bandwidth (400 Mbits, 800 Mbit/s, 1.6 Gbit/s, 3.2 Gbit/s, 6.4 Gbit/s) and performance applications such as storage, video camera controlling connectivity HDTV video recording from cable boxes, high speed scanner connectivity, etc. FireWire was designed as a peer-to-peer protocol, where multiple initiators can be on the same network, devices could be daisy-chained for simple wiring, processing was offloaded from the main computer system... this increased cost but also providing consistent performance across many applications.
[Oracle Exadata, Exalogic, SPARC Supercluster, courtesy NetMgmt]
Next Generation Interconnects: 
Newer generation interconnects consolidate additional functionality such as Infiniband and Thunderbolt.

[6x InfiniBand Ports, courtesy Wikipedia]
Infiniband was suggested to be a possible replacement for PCI, FibreChannel, and Ethernet. Various systems vendors, such as Sun Microsystems (now Oracle), moved to InfiniBand to gain superior performance in HPC [High Performance Computing] clustering and now integrated systems (i.e. Exadata, Exalogic, SPARC SuperCluster, etc.) 
[Apple MacBook Pro Ethernet, Firewire 800, Thunderbolt, and USB ports, courtesy Wikipedia]
Thunderbolt, developed by Intel in collaboration with Apple Computers, was designed initially as an optical system, named Light Peak. When released through Apple, Thunderbolt used a digital DisplayPort copper connection.
[Thunderbolt Technology's block diagram, courtesy Wikipedia]
Thunderbolt Interface

[Thunderbolt Cable with microprocessor in the connector, coutesy TechWorld]
Thunderbold combines some of the best features of SCSI, FireWire, and DisplayPort: Daisy chaining of SCSI, Serial of Firewire, and Digital Video of Mini DP [Mini DisplayPort]. In many ways, Thunderbolt continues in the spirit of SAS, where backwards-compatibility to an existing connection standard (in this case, Mini DisplayPort) was leveraged.

Perhaps the best description of Thunderbolt can be found on Wikipedia:
Thunderbolt combines PCI Express (PCIe) and DisplayPort (DP) into a serial data interface that can be carried over a single cable. Thunderbolt controller chips multiplex data lanes from these two sources for transmission via a duplex Thunderbolt lane then de-multiplex them for consumption from receiver chips. A single Thunderbolt port supports hubs as well as a daisy chain of up to six Thunderbolt devices; as many of these as the host has DP sources may be Thunderbolt monitors.
Tom's Hardware has a great description of how Thunderbolt works, with some diagrams.

[Thunderbolt vs Mini DP comparison, courtesy CNet]
Thunderbolt to Mini DP
The Mini Display Port will attach directly into an existing Thunderbolt port, with no change. It will also connect to the last device of a Thunderbolt daisy-chain. Unfortunately, these legacy Mini DP devices will not be able to daisy-chain additional Thunderbolt devices from them, but at least the former purchase can still be leveraged. CNet published an article nearly 2 years back, warning of possible future confusion - but the backward compatibility is welcome by most.
[Apple Thunderbolt Monitor, courtesy The Register]
Thunderbolt to Apple Thunderbolt Monitor
In December 2011, Apple released a 27" Thunderbolt Display, which included a MacBook power connector, thunderbolt connector, and additional ports on the monitor. The monitor included: firewire 800, USB 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, as well as an additional Thunderbolt daisy-chain port. Adding an old Display Port monitor, additional Thunderbolt monitor, or additional Thunderbold devices should be just fine - but be aware the USB 3.0 ports must be native on the Mac or additionally added through various ways described below in this article.
[Apple's $30 Thunderbolt to FireWire 800, courtesy CNet]
Thunderbolt to FireWire 800
CNet published an article clarifying the use of the Apple Thunderbolt to FireWire 800 cable. As one would expect, using this inexpensive cable, FireWire can be added to a Thunderbolt port or to the end of a Thunderbolt daisy-chain. One would expect that multiple FireWire drives can be chained to the end of this adapter, although the article does not discuss this.

[Apple's $30 Thunderbolt to Gigabit Ethernet Adapter, courtesy ARS Technica]
Thunderbolt to Gigabit Ethernet
ARS Technica published an article on Apple's Thunderbolt to Ethernet interface. Of course, you can't attach a Thunderbolt accessory and control it over Gigabit Ethernet. Also missing is a way to daisy-chain Thunderbolt interfaces, so this should be the last in your chain. On the positive side, this adapter will get close to the theoretical throughput of 1 Gigabit!

[Promise SANLink Thunderbolt to 4GB FibreChannel, courtesy Promise]
Promise SANLink
Promise released the Thunderbolt to FibreChannel 4 Gbit/secl adapter box. This ~$1000 box is available through the Apple Store and will offer portable Macintosh access to SAN storage.

[ATTO ThunderLink NS 1101 (SFP+), Courtesy ATTO Technologies]
ATTO Technology ThunderLink NS 1101
ATTO released a Dual Thunderbolt to 10 Gigabit Ethernet adapter box. Yes, this means you can daisy-chain the box to another, a saturated 10 GigE adapter will saturate half of the Thunderbolt bandwidth. Driver support is available.

[ATTO ThunderLink NT 1102 (10GBASE-T), Courtesy ATTO Technologies]
ATTO ThunderLink NT 1102 (10GBASE-T)
ATTO released a Dual Thunderbolt to Dual 10 Gigabit Ethernet adapter box. Yes, this means you can daisy-chain the box to another. With two 10 Gigabit Ethernet ports, two saturated 10 GigE adapters will saturate an entire Thunderbolt port's bandwidth. Driver support is available.

[ATTO ThunderLink SH 1068, Courtesy ATTO Technologies]
ATTO Technology ThunderLink SH 1068
ATTO released a Dual Thunderbolt to Dual 6 Gbit SAS/SATA adapter box. Yes, this means you can daisy-chain the box to another! With dual SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) interfaces, robust storage is finally available... with the option of cheap/unreliable (yet roomy) SATA (Serial ATA) storage . Driver support is available.

[ATTO ThunderLink FC 1082 8Gb/s FC, Courtesy ATTO Technologies]
ATTO Technology ThunderLink FC 1082
ATTO released a Dual Thunderbolt to Dual 8Gb/sec FibreChannel adapter box. Yes, this means you can daisy-chain the box to another! Dual saturated 8 Gbit FC adapters will nearly saturate Thunderbolt bandwidth. Driver support is available.

Sonnet Thunderbolt to ExpressCard
Thunderbolt PCIe comptability means simple connections from Thunderbolt to external ExpressCard bus can be created. For laptops without enough ports (i.e. USB 3.0) - ExpressCards can easily be added through daisy-chaining via Thunderbolt. Sonnet is one such Thunderbolt to ExpressCard vendor.

Sonnet Thunderbolt to PCIe [PCI Express]
If one wants to work with a portable form-factor but has a need for PCIe [PCI Express] peripherals occasionally in an office, Thunderbolt offers the user such an option. Adding more PCIe cards needed for an existing desktop chassis is also possible. Sonnet is one vendor offering Thunderbolt to PCIe expansions.

Sonnet ExpressCard to USB 3.0
Using the ExpressCard to Thunderbolt, USB 3.0 ports can be easy added to portable systems, providing professional capabilities of larger systems. Sonnet is one such USB 3.0 ExpressCard vendor. Sonnet also offers other ExpressCards such as FireWire, Ethernet, Memory Cards, etc. that can be added through daisey-chaining another Thunderbolt external ExpressCard chassis.

Sonnet ExpressCard to Memory Card
Modern day SDHC Class 10 memory cards (30MBytes/s or 45MBytes/s) can saturate a USB 2.0 interface, so a [Thunderbolt to]  ExpressCard to Memory Card Reader from Sonnet may be a good choice, since there is ample bandwidth under Thunderbolt to handle such traffic.

[LaCie USB3.0 / Thunderbolt External Disk, courtey LaCie]
LaCie Thunderbolt to Storage
Traditional peripheral vendor LaCie offers an external single-ended USB 3.0/Thunderbolt hard drive. It should be noted, there is no daisy-chain off of this drive. This can also be run this drive from a LaCie USB 3.0 ExpressCard, but it requires LaCie drivers and will not work with other USB 3.0 hard disk vendors - the driver was coded to only work with LaCie storage.

[LaCie eSATA Hub, courtesy LaCie]
LaCie Thunderbolt eSATA Hub
LaCie also released a Thunderbolt eSATA Hub, with 2x eSATA connections (to connect to 2x high performance eSATA external drives) and 2x Thunderbolt connectors (to allow daisy-chaining!)

CalDigit Thunderbolt to USB 3.0 Storage
For those users with Thunderbolt and without USB 3.0, Caldigit has an ExpressCard to USB 3.0 generic external storage. For pre-USB 3.0 Mac platforms, drivers are required, but should work with any storage vendor, although not tested against everyone elses storage.

[CalDigit T1 and T2 external dual-thunderbold interface drives, courtesy CalDigit]
CalDigit Thunderbolt to External Storage
Thunderbolt external storage with dual interfaces is essential for daisy-chaining additional components. With the CalDigit T1 & T2, not only is this possible, but drives are removable, for hot-swaping in RAID sets.

Matrox DS-1 Thunderbolt Docking Station
Adding a Thunderbolt Docking Station may solve a lot of connectivity issues for the portable laptop user. The Matrox DS1 Docking Station adds: 1x USB 3.0 port, 2x USB 2.0 ports, DVI or HDMI port, Gigabit Ethernet, Stereo Headphones, and Microphone port. Note, no thunderbolt daisy-chaining on this unit, but with monitor & USB 3.0 - there may not be a need.

[Belkin Thunderbolt Docking Station, courtesy Belkin]
Belkin Thunderbolt Docking Station
The Belkin Thunderbolt Docking Station is late to be released, but offers daisy-chaining not available in the early-to-market Matrox unit. With 1x Gigabit Ethernet, 1x 800Mb/s FireWire, 2x Thunderbolt, and 3x USB 3.0 ports - this is an absolutely amazing unit!
[Thunderbolt Devices available circa 2013, courtesy TechWorld]
Thunderbolt Devices in 2013
TechWorld published a slideshow describing Thunderbolt devices due in 2013. Blackmagic has a Standard and High Definition Thunderbolt video capture unit on-tap. G-Technology announced 4 and 8 bay portable RAID enclosures. LaCie announced their Little Big Disk, daisy-chainable Thunderbolt. Apple announced their 27 inch daisy-chainable Thunderbolt monitor. Promise announced 4TB, 6TB, 8TB, and 12TB Thunderbolt RAID units.
[Buffalo Ministation Thunderbolt/USB 3.0 Drive, courtesy PC Magazine]
Buffalo Thunderbolt Hard Drives
Buffalo offers a 500 Gigabyte and 1 Terabyte Drive which is both compatible with Thuderbolt and USB 3.0, but note there is no daisy-chaining on this drive available.

[Western Digital 6TB Thunderbolt dual drive, courtesy MacWorld]
Western Digital Thunderbolt Hard Drives Western Digital offers both a 4 Terabyte and 6 Terabyte form factor dual external thunderbolt drive. Also, there is the WD 2 Terabyte MyBook with dual thunderbolt interface external drive. These drives are both daisy-chain capable.

PROMISE Pegasis J2 SSD RAID, courtesy Anandtech]

PROMISE Pegasis J2 SSD Thunderbolt Drives
The Pegasis J2 is offered in 2 different sizes by PROMISE: 256 Gigabytes and 512 Gigabytes. The 256 GB solution uses dual 128 GB SSD's, while the 512GB solution uses diak 256 GB SSD's. Note, there is only one thunderbolt port, so there is no daisy-chaining. Also, the power draw of the SSD and RAID controller are so great that full-speed is only possible using an external power adapter.

[LaCie 2big Thunderbolt RAID Drives, courtesy MacWorld]
LaCie Thunderbolt Hard Drives
LaCie is offering 3 types of desktop thunderbolt drives, ranging from: 5400RPM 2TB LittleBigDisk; to the 7200RPM 4TB and 6TB 2big external disks with removable drives; 512 GB and 1 TB SATA III SSD Thunderbolt LittleBigDisk without removable disks. All drives offer two Thunderbolt ports for daisy-chaining.

[LaCie Rugged, courtesy MacWorld]
LaCie Rugged Thunderbolt and USB 3.0 Hard Drives
LaCie is also offering their Rugged portable USB 3.0 / Thunderbolt drives, in a 1 TB disk and 256 GB SSD form factors. Note, there is no daisy-chaining on these drives.

[G-Technology 4TB, 6TB, 8TB G-RAID with Thunderbolt, courtesy MacWorld]
G-Technology G-RAID Thunderbolt
Offered from G-Technology is a dual-thunderbolt port capable G-RAID sytsems in 4 Terabyte, 6 Terabyte, and 8 Terabyte systems. Yes, you can daisy-chain these thunderbolt systems.

Apple Macintosh with USB 3.0 Storage
Thunderbolt storage is not the only game in town. An effective step-down from Thunderbolt is to use USB 3.0. If an Apple Macintosh with native USB 3.0 is unavailable, one of several options are available: PCIe to USB 3.0, ExpressCard to USB 3.0, Thuderbolt Hub, Thunderbolt to ExpressCard to USB 3.0, Thunderbolt to PCIe to USB 3.0. The results will be close to what is illustrated in the above video.

Apple Macintosh with FireWire 800 Storage
USB 3.0 is only slightly faster (5% on a 16 Gigabyte file copy) than FireWire 800 in real-world performance to an external drive. If you need storage today, you can't hold out for Thunderbolt, you don't have USB 3.0 capabilities - FireWire is still a very reasonable path to move forward with. With an inexpensive Thunderbolt to FireWire interface, even newer Apple Macintoshes without FireWire can have robust performing daisy-chain storage using Thunderbolt to FireWire 800 interface.

With Thunderbolt, formerly low-end and portable systems can now have full storage and various card expansion components available to them, at minimal extra cost. Machines utilizing Thunderbolt will probably start appearing on the LAN's and require additional management in the very near future, as more robust options continue to appear for them.